Comments on: Logo Of The Month: March 2009

By: webdesign

webdesign — Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:52:13 +0000

Hi, thanks for this very usefull post. I can definitely use this!

By: Sajjad Haider Syed

Sajjad Haider Syed — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 06:17:41 +0000

LionJ:

Thanks (I assume you mean to say “Good Logo”)….

By: LionJ

LionJ — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:56:54 +0000

Goog Logo

By: Sajjad Haider Syed

Sajjad Haider Syed — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:41:05 +0000

Jill:

Thanks buddy

By: Jill

Jill — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:34:58 +0000

Love this logo. I think it visually says exactly what it should. Definitely identifiable and memorable.

By: Sajjad Haider Syed

Sajjad Haider Syed — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:45:05 +0000

Thanks Davin…

By: Davin Greenwell

Davin Greenwell — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:44:19 +0000

This is a good logo. It’s the familiar dialogue box logo but more innovative and symbolic while remaining simple. I like it.

By: Sajjad Haider Syed

Sajjad Haider Syed — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:11:55 +0000

Mike:

I exactly know what you are talking about: we use to have transparency problems in printing long ago but now after the technology is improved a lot… so theres no problem, BUT for your info….

I’m not using any transparency in the logo, the overlapped shapes have there own solid colors… and even B&W version will be done properly so dont worry…

By: Mike

Mike — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:26:17 +0000

The use of transparency worries me for print and bw. But for web it’s still effective.

By: Sajjad Haider Syed

Sajjad Haider Syed — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:26:10 +0000

Thanks Michael:

Actually on white only the colors will be shown but still it will not loss its exclusivity…